Document Type : Scientific-Research

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Linguistics, Alzahra University

2 Associate professor, Department of Linguistics, Alzahra University

Abstract

Discourse, as a system of signs, generally constructs individual and social behaviors. In every order of discourse, a collection of rules and conventions is stipulated in order to construct discourse principles. In regard to their ideological purposes, social actors tend to import signs into their discourse framework. Simultaneously, language as a significant constructive component appears and begins to establish the intended meaning of social actors in a soft manner. Thus Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, at an international level, utilizes language facilities for representing political facts. According to sociopolitical events and governing atmosphere, he attempts to establish signs in his discourse framework. In a semiotic model of this discourse framework, axiomatic signs are set into the center while the others are around the central point. Accordingly, this research focuses mainly on how foregrounding and backgrounding function in foreign policy discourse of Shah. Then in this way, hegemonic and dominant signs have been specified. Moreover, according to dominant discourse features, five periods are determined as follows: first period: 1320-1324, second period: 1325-1332, third period: 1333-1344, fourth period: 1345-1352, and fifth period: 1353-1356; furthermore, a discourse framework is determined for each period. The results show that notorious incidents occurred at certain junctures not only stir "self" and "other" identities within the realm of otherization, but it will also lead to alteration of shah's framework as well as displacement of signs.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Adībzādih, M. 2008. Zabān, Guftimān wa Sīāsati Khāridjī Dīāliktīk Bāznamāī az Gharb dar Djahāni Numādīni Īrānī. Akhtarān Press, Tehran. (In Persian) (Book)
Asadī, H. and F. Sāsānī. 2013. Bāznamāī Kunishgarāni Idjtimāʻī dar Guftimāni Sīāsat Khāridjī Muḥammad Riḍā Pahlawī bar Asāsi Mudili Idjtimāʻī-Maʻnāīi Van Leeuven. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 9(18): 39-64. (In Persian with English Abstract) (Journal)
Asadī, H. and F. Sāsānī. 2017. Ghiyrīyatsāzī dar Guftimāni Sīāsat Khāridjī Muḥammad Riḍā Pahlawī. Journal of Language Research, 9(22): 7-24. (In Persian with English Abstract) (Journal)
Fairclough, N. 2001. Language and Power. Longman, London. (Book)
Fowler, R. 1991. Language in the News; Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Routledge, London/ New York. (Book)
Gasiorowski, M. 1990. Security relation between the United States and Iran, 1953-1978.In Keddie, N. and Gasiorowski, M. (eds.), Neither East Nor West: Iran, the Soviet Union and the United States: 145- 165. Yale University, New Haven & London. (Journal)
Halliday, M.A.K.1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Arnold, London. (Book)
Halliday, M.A.K. 2004.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Arnold, London. (Book)
Hawkins, B. 2001. Incorporating tension on the treatment of ideology in cognitive linguistics. In Dirven, R. and Hawkins, B. and Esra, S. (eds.), Language and Ideology: Theoretical Cognitive Approaches, 1-22. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. (Journal)
Herrmann, R.1990. The Role of Iran in Soviet Perception and Policy, 1946-1988. In Keddie, N. and Gasiorowski, M. (eds.), Neither East Nor West: Iran, the Soviet Union, and the United States, 63-99. Yale University. New Haven & London. (Journal)
Jorgensen, M. and P. Louise. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory Method. SAGE, London. (Book)
Keddie, N. 2003. Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution. Yale University Press, New Haven & London. (Book)
Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Toward a Radical Democratic Politics. VERSO, London & New York. (Book)
Mahdawī, ʻA. 2006. Sīāsati Khāridjī Īrān dar Durāni Pahlawī. Piykān Press, Tehran. (In Persian) (Book)
Pahlawī, M.R. (n.d). Madjmūʻih Taʼlīfāt, Nuṭḳhā, Payāmhā, Muṣāḥibihā wa Bayānāti AʻlāʼḤaḍrat Ārīyāmihr Shāhanshāhi Īrān. Vol. 1-11, (n.p). (In Persian) (Book)
Ramazani, R.1975. Iran's Foreign Policy: Study of Foreign Policy in Modernizing Nations. University Press of Virginia, United States of America. (Book)
Sulṭānī, ʻA.A. 2005. Ḳudrat, Guftimān wa Zabān. Niy Press, Tehran. (In Persian) (Book)
Sulṭānī, ʻA.A. 2004. Taḥlīli Guftimān bi Muthābih Naẓarīyih wa Rawish. Journal of Political Science. 28:153-180. (In Persian with English Abstract) (Journal)
Van Dijk, T. 1993. Principle of critical discourse analysis. 4(2): 249-283. Discourse& Society. (Journal)
Van Dijk, T. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage, London. (Book)
Van Leeuween, T. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (Book)