Ahmad Mahmoudi; Mehran Tabatabai Poodeh
Abstract
Despite the importance of Analysis of the suspicion reasons of sayyed Mohammad ' s imamate, these issues are the neglected. Traditions indicating that imamate belongs to ...
Read More
Despite the importance of Analysis of the suspicion reasons of sayyed Mohammad ' s imamate, these issues are the neglected. Traditions indicating that imamate belongs to the older child of imam, Those indicating imamate of the sayyed Mohammad, lack of proper understanding of the Bda’ concept , lack of public specification to imamate of Imam Hassan Askari (AS) , kindness of imam Hadi (AS) to sayyed Mohammad, suspicion background to imamate of Ismail and Abbasid strangulation and restriction in the case of introduction of imam Askari (AS) are numbers of reasons to Suspicion of sayyed Mohammad ' s Imamate; that are criticized and evaluated in this study. Also narrations which introduced names of the twelve imams after Imam Bagher (AS ) and are quoted and referred by oppositions of sayyed Mohammad ' s imamate , with the narrator diagramming to identify probable forgery cases are investigated. The conclusion is that none of the factors implicate to the imamate of sayyed Mohammad and imam Hadi (AS ) did not commit a mistake in determining successor. Narrations naming twelve imams can not be forged and fabricated by narrators and the suspicion of sayyed Mohammad ' s imamate is result of surmises of people, kindness of imam Hadi (AS) to him and considerations of introducing imam Askari because of repression during the Abbasid rule .
