Mohammad Masoud Aghaei; Abolhassan Fayyaz Anush; Seyyed Asghar Mahmoud Abadi
Abstract
Fardid describes his contemporary philosophy as the knowledge of historical almos. In Fardid's thought, historical thought, the result of the manifestation and absence of the name of ...
Read More
Fardid describes his contemporary philosophy as the knowledge of historical almos. In Fardid's thought, historical thought, the result of the manifestation and absence of the name of Allah in the mysticism of Ibn Arabi, as it appears in the book of Fusus alHikam and in the works of his commentators. Along with historic issues in the philosophy of Heidegger, the great philosopher of the twentieth century, Germany, and brought it together with its own kind of art as a historical knowledge. Many scholars consider the gathering of historical thought of Ibn Arabi and Heidegger, who belong to two different historical, as a worthless action. Although the writer has criticized Frdid's philosophy of history, he believes that Fardid's work is a rethinking of two different traditions in the East and West of the world and its collection in its own intellectual system. The main question of this research is that what fardid philosophical thinking of astrology has had for scholars in history? The claim of this research is that though there may be some flaws in fardid's historical thought, but for those who study history professionally, there are fundamental insights that have so far been missed by academics in the history field and this article tries to explain and describe this way of thinking.
